Posts Tagged ‘Science Fiction’


Why even bother writing science fiction

In my own novel I allow the protagonist and other citizens to provide passive scans.  These scans reveal names and other, mostly innocuous information, but colonists, basically super-citizens, are able to pull out more interesting information from the global database.  Similarly, these credentials allow access to different parts of the city, queue in to the transportation network with saved preferences, and reference all manner of banking and authentication services.

Luckily, in my world, these tools are used rather infrequently and their misuse, while possible, is considered relatively rare and insignificant.  I’m not so sure our own world is on such a benign track.   The rules regarding large corporate database’s are especially arcane.  How much information does Facebook actually have?  How easily can that be connected with other publicly accessible information?  Given the nearly endless supply of personal details that pass through the system, often without an individual’s knowledge, the potential for mischief is staggering.  It would be an interesting study to find out how completely a person who was not a member of Facebook or Myspace or another social networking service could be constructed through implied data.

Even more interesting is the possibilty of collisions or orphaned data.  Will two people appear merged in a database?  With a certain level of skill and luck, could a person construct an entire digital persona so completely that they, for all intents and purposes, actually exist?  In time could this profile, meticulously crafted for years, be translated into a real life identity?  Currently a person can’t apply for a driver’s license using a Myspace profile, but newscorp doesn’t own the DMV yet.  That’s maybe excessive…but I have to wonder how much.

Almost Monday, have a good week everyone!

IO9 made a list of favorite last lines from science fiction stories.  It came out about a month ago, but, as always, I’m running on a back log.  I’m still trying to hammer out the last line on my own story and my current inspiration du jour probably comes from Gibson’s Neuromancer.

” So what’s the score?  How are things different?  You running the world now?  You God?”

“Things aren’t different.  Things are things.”

Somewhere, very close, the laughter that wasn’t laughter.

He never saw Molly again.

I like how the ending wraps together very nicely and completely but with enough amibiguity to keep it interesting.  It’s more than just a ‘leave room for a sequel ambiguity’ but an actual confusion on the part of the world of what might come next.  I find it very realistic and intriguing.

The lines Io9 chose are pretty good too…

Adieu!

Laser Space Communications

I read Laser Space Communications as part of my Lonetracker research.  It’s pretty technical overall, at least for me, but it was an interesting read.  It seems to be fairly expensive to get a hold of so if someone is looking around for it I can lend it out.  *I wish I was better at physics.

Io9 published (about a month ago, what can I say, I’m working on a backlog), an article on the novels that originated their own science fiction sub genres.  A few are obvious ones (Neuromancer and Cyberpunk, Frankenstein and Gothic Science Fiction.)   Others are a bit more obscure, at least as far as my experience.

As expected the comments are filled with suggestions on alternate books to fill the various categories.  Interesting stuff!

Worth reading is the link to the ‘cranky essay’ looking further in cyberpunk.  (Relinked here.)

After finishing Count Zero last week I jumped into Mona Lisa Overdrive, William Gibson’s third and final novel in that Sprawl trilogy, a science fiction series set in a hypertechnological, paranoid,  corporate dominated, cyber-dystopia that began with Neuromancer.

Mona Lisa Overdrive ended the trilogy and brought to a close, or mostly a close, the story that began with Case and Mollys adventure in Neuromancer.  Molly makes a return and she’s part of this third novel.  I’m reviewing, of course, a novel that’s nearly two decades old.  I’ve quite a bit of catching up to do, but all in all the Sprawl trilogy is the in total probably the best series I’ve ever read.  While none of books match the sheer joy of Neuromancer or capture the near mystical sense of expectation I had reading it, they each shed light on simply a fascinating world that seems, despite all the futuristic technology, to be just around the corner.

Seeing as I wrote out my general criticisms just two days ago with Count Zero I’ll let this stand as is.  Read Neuromancer, at the very least!

Count Zero

Count Zero

I finished Count Zero as part of my read-a-thon.  It’s loosely the sequel to Neuromancer, which I read a few months ago and loved.  This ’sequel’ is set in the same world and a few years later, but has none of the same characters, although they are obliquely mentioned.  It’d be easy to argue that it’s not a true sequel at all, but it continued one important plot thread was left behind at the end of Neuromancer.  (No I’m not going to give that away.  Everyone should read Neuromancer, not pick it up through a review.)

Count Zero has the same rock solid prose, as fast paced as an old detective novel, but with post-modern (literally) color.  The world is the same paranoid, hyper-technological wasteland as the first.  The characters were not as good as Neuromancer.  They were interesting and had their quirks, but none of them changed all that much.  Even the character that was literally dragged into a new world didn’t experience all that much of an epiphany at his new surroundings and the female lead that was similarly introduced to world very much beyond her seemed to pick up it in her very first chapter.  Still, it was excellent and not just from the writing or the world (which I’m fond of.)  The story kept along the thread that I mentioned before and read in that context you can see a certain devious subtlety that hints at more to come.

If anything, the story just suffered from having a bigger world to work with.  Neuromancer only had the necessity of describing the protagonists’ immediate world.  A sequel, nearly by definition, has to expand the circle, but that means incorporating far more than the story itself requires.  In the cases where it over-reached, the plot came across as too weak.  Where it failed to expand, there was confusion.  It tried hard to fill the void, but sadly, it wasn’t as much of a thrill to follow as in Neuromancer, but well, that was a tough act to follow.

Currently I’m reading Mona Lisa Overdrive.  That’s the third story in the general arc.  I’m hoping it has the same prose, but with a defter touch.  Cheers!

I’ll be writing a lot of book reviews for Servusamanu over the next few weeks.   After months of pushing reading back in order to get a few extra words written (Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire being a nopted divergence), I’ve got a whole stack of books to get through.  With the my story finally all nice and drafted, I’m taking something of a break to finally get through.

The first on the stack is an old wilted book with yellowed pages and a creased spine.  1.75 is printed in the top corner in black letters.  It looks like a small travel guide, twenty years old and dumped in an attic.

Happens to be one of the most exciting science fiction books I’ve ever read.  Book, is maybe not the best classification.  It’s four short stories each separate from each other all set in a distant future where society, technology, business, and exploration have long since challenged the present norms.  The first story is a navy training expedition into space, a grueling year journey that is almost always lethal to a few crewmen.  The second story is a 1984esque world of social classification and bureaucracy.  The third is a world so crowded space and privacy are the ultimate signs of wealth.  The last is about a rig, somewhat akin to an oil rig, that harvests resources from a peaceful ocean planet.  It doesn’t stay peaceful for long, but the enemy is, well, not what one would expect.

Jack Vance is a well-known author and I probably should have delved into one of his books quite a bit sooner.  He writes with the sparse and fast-paced style more common to the era of small books and detective paperbacks and it works very well for short stories.  I must have gone through a hundred pages a minute, only stopping to digest each story before it whizzed completely by.  I definitely expect to read more of his stuff.  (Also George RR Martin recently helped with an anthology of his stuff.

Next book up is The Secret by Jack McDevitt.

Close…so close! They were so close to getting Star Trek right. I saw it on Friday and I liked it, but I didn’t love it and in some ways I’m terribly disappointed. I’m going to try to veer away from any huge spoilers, but I’ll drop a few things so be aware.

First, let me say that they got the casting right. I suspected they’d botch it from the beginning with either hammy overactors or simply irresponsible clones of the originals. Instead, they pretty much nailed it. Zachary Quinto channeled Leonard Nimoy’s original stoic, austere Spock and managed to humanize the character just enough. He was perfect. Chris Pines managed a slightly more action oriented, but equally charming / obnoxious Captain Kirk. He captured the swagger and brashness to a T. The other characters did almost as well. Karl Urban, as ‘Bones’ McCoy, kept the doctor as the cranky elder voice. Simon Pegg, was a bit too hectic maybe, but an admirable Montgomery Scott. The front two, Sulu and Chekov, were my least favorite castings, (played by John Cho and Anton Yelchin respectively) Both fulfilled their roles as crewmen, but in the case of Sulu, added too little personality, and for Chekov, perhaps too much, but neither overplayed their roles.

The most interesting casting was Zoe Saldana as Uhuru, the communications officer. She fills in admirably as the communications officer and also as Spock’s love interest. Spock’s never had a love interest, but it works well, especially since it is the one thing that Kirk loses at. It makes Spock not just the nerdy overachiever, but also as a capable, competitive opposition to Kirk. It worked very well.

The casting was top-notch and the setting was just as good. The updated Enterprise referenced the old one. No one would have suspected it was anything but the Enterprise, it had all the old beeps and whistles, but the updated look: smooth viewscreens, CGI space shots, and slightly more official looking uniforms fit much better than the old set certainly would have. The other settings, aside from an oddly grungy Romulan spaceship, which I’ll be discussing in a bit, were similarly perfect. Starfleet Academy looked like it should, the planets had that futuristic, distant quality, and Vulcan, an ancient, austere, but scientific planet, was perfect. The special effects were, predictably, top notch and well done.

Like I said, it was so close. The only problem was the plot. And not even the entire plot. The movie follows, along one thread, the interactions between Kirk and Spock becoming friends and leaders of the Enterprise. A cold wariness and general dislike evolves into a strong friendship. Kirk’s rashness is just a bit tempered; Spock’s unintentional cruelty is forced out of him. Bones is there being grumpy, Chekov comedic, Sulu weird, etc. The crew comes together in perfect fashion to save the day. It worked.

The overall plot, however, showed far less discretion. An old Ambassador Spock tries to stop a supernova and winds up going back in time along with a disgruntled Romulan space miner, altering history. Kirk’s father gets killed (which is actually a decent touch) as the Romulan arrives in the new timeline. Twenty five years later, a rebellious Kirk joins Starfleet. He joins the Enterprise which responds to a Romulan on Vulcan. They arrive to find the Space Miner destroy Vulcan, (but only after a ridiculous fight scene on a giant drill bit). The rest of the story has Kirk meet the Old Spock and give him advice on dealing with the New Spock so that the crew can come together to prevent the Romulan from destroying Earth. I’m going through this quickly because it doesn’t make all that much sense. Black Holes == Time Travel, is really the key thing to take away. In the end, New Spock and Old Spock are both alive and living in a new universe with a destroyed Vulcan. Presumably the other universe still exists? Maybe not? It’s not explained and I guess it doesn’t really matter.

Except…that other universe would be the one that everyone has spent the last forty years living in during each of the various series and movies. That seems so very depressing and so insulting really. They wanted to reboot the series…great! They could have made a new Star Trek set on a different starship during the same time as the original Enterprise, or anywhere/when else. They never needed to erase the previous timeline for the new one.

Aside from being a hokey plot device, the time travel was just so completely unnecessary (and scientifically dubious in a series that tries to maintain at least a veneer of respectability). The real story was the growing friendship between the various crewmen. The overall plot just needed enough action and danger to give the crew a reason to bond and nearly any story could have done that. Something simple would have sufficed: an older Ambassador Spock is traveling to a resigning of the neutral zone treaty between the Romulans, Klingons, and Federation. Along the way he tells a younger Ambassador the story of the first time he helped sign the treaty. Then the movie would flash back to the crew going through Starfleet and coming together as they battle some rogue Romulan who is trying to sabotage the peace proceedings. Is it the most exciting story? Not by any stretch. Does it allow for enough action to be exciting, stay true to the generally peaceful mission of the Federation, and give the crew a danger to confront? Yes, I’d say that it does and, most of all, it doesn’t throw the rest of the long and stories Star Trek Universe into complete disarray.

If you like (but don’t love) Star Trek, you should probably see it. It’s certainly better than the last handful of Star Trek movies that have come out and, well, it’s not a half bad take on the whole universe. I’m cranky because they’re making changes to MY universe, but they actually did a good job. The casting alone must have just been a nightmare. They worked hard to get that much right so there was obviously an honest attempt at honoring and expanding the world. I wish they could have gone in a slightly different direction (and I still think time travel is 99% lame), but it was fun to watch the old crew get together, at least one more time. For ‘Trekkies’, I suspect the movie is as disillusioning as the new trio of Star Wars movies were for that bunch of fans, but for everyone else, it’s a pretty decent movie.

Some day I want to be on this list.

During one my general perusals of the internet I came upon this gallery of images depicting various proposed space structures for habitation. Part of the novel I’m been working on includes some space colonies so it seemed relevant to poke around a little bit.

As cool as the images are, there is some fascinating research that has gone into the feasibility of these possible habitations. The Dyson Sphere, shown in one of the Star Trek images, in particular has a whole host of science behind it. I also really liked the article on Kemperer Rosettes.

Enjoy!