As mentioned, I work as a network administrator. As part of my duties I also support 66 libraries within a certain five county area. My department, Computer Operations, maintains a number of services for the libraries some of which are free, some of which are charged on a per case basis, and some of which are contracted support for a duration.
A number of issues have come up over the last year in relation to our support mechanism, many of which have posed problems with our overall infrastructure. I’ve come to compile a short list of warnings that seem to apply well beyond the specific contracts in question.
The biggest issue is a lack of clarity and understanding of what the contract actually entails. We periodically have issues regarding whether jobs are in contract or out of contract. The problem is not necessary a lack of technical knowledge on either end, but an ambiguity within the contract itself. Issues cannot be resolved with a close reading because the contract simply leaves the questions unanswered. The contract never should have been written as it is.
Having a process for mediating conflicts and making changes is equally important. Our client libraries will work with us for decades or longer. We need a process of responding to complaints and removing the ambiguities in the contract. Problems will always become apparent if enough time is put to a task, but there must a response when they arise.
Long duration contracts require greater responsibility for the support party. It’s just a statement of truth. When we support a network for a year long contract we are obligated to respond to every issue regardless of what it might be. Further, we become responsible if and when problems arise regardless of whether it was preventable or not. Per item contracts decrease the number of things brought to our door and remove the responsibility from our shoulders. The downside is the clients will never request preventive maintenance. (Similar problem exists within healthcare.)
The last big thing is keeping and giving out documentation. Having a full record of what went on for who and how much it cost is invaluable. Our record-keeping has been splotchy, at best, and the result is that no party has the slightest idea whether a contract has been fulfilled. The organization is so infinitely haphazard that clients have had to ask us whether the work was performed, because we never gave them and they never requested any receipt of work done. Without any accountability on either side, neither the clients nor the providers can improve.
I imagine few organizations have these sorts of issues to the extent that we do. Library systems have their own unique niche within the world, but nevertheless I’ve learned from our problems and…hopefully…someday we’ll get them all solved.
